Apple MB261LL/A Christmas Discounts!
 |
Apple MB261LL/A Christmas Discounts!.
Product: Apple MB261LL/A Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Apple MB261LL/A
Apple 4 GB iPod nano AAC/MP3 Player Silver (3rd Generation)
Apple's fresh nano is designed to improve upon past models and add some functionality. The improved video, smaller thinner body and updated firmware are enough to obtain it stand out. The slightly lower note price is also clear to assist sell more units.
I contemplate most buyers will opt to fetch the 8GB, considering it is only $50 more than the 4GB and actually makes the video function more usable. Apple 8 GB iPod nano AAC/MP3 Player Blue (3rd Generation) Regardless, the fresh nano is an improvement in any size.
Pros
+ Exiguous size - so thin!!!!
+ Nice get - shorter, fatter develop factor for more reliability
+ Brushed aluminum front seems more durable than plastic composite of 2nd generation nano
+ Many color options - Silver, blue, green, gloomy, etc.
+ Brighter mask with better dissimilarity than previous generation
+ Gargantuan video option is a nice to have for sample TV shows, clips, etc
+ Works with most outmoded iPod accessories (except ragged A/V cable)
+ Priced to sell! Lowest effect Apple video sterling player
+ Lower mark imprint than 2nd Generation nano
+ Unlike iPod classic, all flash memory means less failures and breakage
+ Flash memory also awesome for running / working out
+ Slightly better sound quality than 2nd generation
+ Apple reputation is highly deserved
Cons
- 4 GB capacity is very itsy-bitsy for a video player and will require constant reloading via iTunes
- Unusual 2GB Plug option provides a workout alternative at about 1/3 the price
- Unique acquire not ideal for very sizable hands due to smaller click wheel
- Universal dock now required for video out (no more A/V cable)
- Slightly shorter battery life than other iPods
- No expandability or SD card slot like Sansa Plan or Creative Zen
- iTunes software with exiguous native formats (MP3, AAC)
- Coverflow unruffled buggy / slow
- Features built-in to competing players, like FM radio & impart recording, powerful be bought as add-ons,
- Competing players now available at 16GB flash at similar body size
The Looks
Some people prefered the gen2 nano's longer body and larger click wheel. The longer nano was prone to bend (and sometimes smash) when people place them in their pocket and sat down or moved around. The smaller click-wheel can be awkward, particularly for those with enormous hands. But it's a pleasurable trade-off for the smaller size and better durability.
Another change motivated by durability is the metal face. The archaic sure composite face was a magnet for smudges and scratches. The unusual brushed metal face holds up nicer. Be warned though; it can chip and scratch, so rep a screen.
The Sound
Sound quality is not significantly improved from previous models. The exiguous improvements touted in Apple's marketing are exaggerated. However, let's be shapely to Apple here. MP3 and even CD audio have inherent sound quality limitations.
MP3 is a compression technology that does experience quality loss, however minimal. With a lower bitrate your MP3 files will lose more and more of the sound integrity from the novel recording. Combine that with the fact many people rip from sources that are not digitally mastered, and you would procure unpleasant sound quality with any contrivance.
Almost no MP3 players are actually designed for audiophiles / musicians / sound engineers; i.e., the people who could assure the disagreement between honorable sound and enormous sound. Fortunately, some of these devices are starting to near onto the market.
Features and Software
Few original features are powerful with this draw. Changes in the components and software construct the veil brighter and allow you to do more things, including search for videos and play games. Some complain there isn't enough memory for video. You can composed rep enough on here to notice one movie or fit some TV shows with your music. It's a nice extra even if these nanos don't have ample memory.
The flash memory in this contrivance could have been a faster rush. However, the main advantages of the flash player are serene here: less risk of hardware failure associated with a hard disk drive player (better for running or working out) .
The design does seem to have a shorter battery life than advertised. Perhaps because of the smaller body size Apple placed a smaller batter inside. As long as you sync and charge at night, it's ok. You are level-headed likely to accept a day's worth of consume from a chunky charge.
Apple's software is level-headed a weakness with very puny bid control over your scheme library and few native file options. All formats can be converted using iTunes or another software. You can convert magnificent grand any file to the MP3, MP4, or AAC formats you need for iTunes. This will mean that those of us with other players will have to have 2 versions of our libraries on our computers, eating up hard-drive status. That's because there's no toddle and fall adding into the player, you have to add it to iTunes first and then sync.
However, most users have runt needs and will not peep if they are using MP3s. Apple hits the minimum compatibility needs of most of the market.
Coverflow is slight more than a gimmick. It's unexcited buggy and covers tend to blank out if you scroll snappy. Screen art has been downloaded with previous software versions and most other video players, so the ability to scroll covers is not really a breakthrough.
Competitors Pros and Cons
Apple's devices are obviously more expensive than other players on a per gigabyte $ cost. In addition, the iPod aloof has fewer built-in features than most competitive devices. It doesn't have a built-in FM radio tuner, assure recorder, Bluetooth, WMA attend, and an SD card expansion slot. Both the Creative Zen Creative Zen 4 GB MP3 Player (Shaded) and the Sansa Opinion SanDisk Sansa Plan 8 GB MP3 Player have micro SD slots, FM tuners and convey recording components built in. Both are better priced. The Sansa Understanding comes in a 16GB size for the same effect as the 8GB nano.
Still the iPod Nano beats both those players on size as the Creative Zen is worthy thicker and the Sansa Belief is taller. Also retain in mind that the Creative Zen has been somewhat buggy, and the Belief doesn't have as long a track picture only being released in November 2007.
The fresh Sony players have finally abandoned their beget unpleasant software, and now provide some first-rate competition to the iPod nano. In typical Sony fashion, they are priced honest as high as the nano. But they do have quality components and better sound quality. Sony NWZA816BLK 4GB Walkman Video MP3 Player (Dismal)
The original 2 GB iPod Go, released in February 2008, probably provides the biggest competition if you don't care about video and your only spend is working out. Apple iPod dart 2 GB Silver (2nd Generation) For 1/3 the ticket, you fetch a player with half the capacity that's designed for longer battery life and more active expend.
Conclusion
In the slay, what the iPod nano does, it does very well. Apple really wins with sleek execute and a wealth of accessories. This unit is no different. Not all docks and accessories work with the 3rd generation, but many do. And for that mountainous number of users already using iTunes, fascinating your music over to the nano is a snap.
Overall this intention is an improvement. Apple's entry level video player will continue to be well-liked due to mountainous features, acceptable pricing and the Apple imprint.
Enjoy!!!
Apple iPod nano 8 GB Sunless (3rd Generation)
This review is for the 8GB iPod Nano. All the reviews for the third generation Nanos have been combined by Amazon. While this unit is very similar to the 4GB iPod Nano Apple 4 GB iPod Nano (3rd Gen) there are enough differences that they each deserve a closer watch.
Choosing Among iPods
Overall, I would decide the 8 GB iPod Nano over the 4 GB nano and the 8 GB iPod Touch. This unit is priced suitable, and at only $50 more than the 4 GB unit it's a no brainer. Those who want to step up should watch to the 16 GB Apple iPod Touch 16 GB or 32 GB iPod Touch Apple iPod touch 32 GB. I have been lucky enough to live with all these players, so I hope this helps you choose.
Hopefully Apple will soon compose a 16 GB or even a 32 GB Nano available. Only the iPod Touch currently sports those capacities. Till they offer larger sizes the 8GB is the biggest option. The cloak is little, but the regular buttons and click wheel allow easier volume and track changes and better spend on the go than the iPod Touch.
Some may resolve to pay an extra $100 more than this to step up to the 8 GB iPod Touch Apple iPod touch 8 GB with Software Upgrade. The extra features of the Touch are awesome. The high overhead of the Touch software gives you 6 to 6.5 GB of useable site out of those 8 GB. That is objective not enough to explain the higher impress.
Comparing to Competing Players - Features and Concerns
The iPod Nano collected has less features than most competitive devices. It doesn't have a built-in FM radio tuner, insist recorder, bluetooth, WMA benefit, or an expansion slot. More and more users query those features. Both the thicker Creative Zen Creative Zen 8 GB (Dusky) and the taller Sansa ViewSanDisk Sansa Opinion 8 GB MP3 Player include most of those features. They both also now approach in 16GB and 32GB capacities.
The Creative Zen does have slightly better sound and file version encourage. But its native software is even worse and the company has acquired a reputation for high failure rates. Conversely, the Sansa Belief is perhaps the best value but the video cloak and sound quality is less splendid than either two. Perhaps the fresh Sansa Fuze may have more improvements, but we'll have to wait and stare SanDisk Sansa Fuze 8 GB MP3 Player (Silver) .
Of course the growing Zune population gets wireless sharing and syncing Zune 8 GB Digital Media Player Unlit (2nd Generation) . But Zune's camouflage is also less fair for video and the design has other issues. So I would tranquil decide the Nano over the Zune.
Perhaps the best unique competitor is the 800 series Sony MP3 player Sony NWZA818BLK 8GB Walkman Video MP3 Player (Unlit) . For years, Sony devices suffered from proprietary audio formats and both annoying and unethical software limitations. Sony has finally given in to MP3 format, though I'm definite they will try to sneak in DRM at every turn. Surprisingly, even though Apple is the obvious market leader Sony's has almost overpriced their units. While expensive, they do have the durable metal body like Nanos. And in terms of sound quality, I would say they are honest as suitable if not slightly better. I objective don't consumers should pay them a premium.
The Sound
Sound quality has been slightly improved. Apple has a distinguished better reputation and lower failure rates than music players marketed on high fidelity sound. Quality components and jacks aloof matters. But there is composed no player on the market today that can truly claim hi-fi sound.
Some technical limits design it very difficult to score lossless sound out of any arrangement regardless of source file. Lower bitrates obtain your MP3 files lose more and more sound integrity, and even CDs have quality limits, which are even lower if they are not digitally mastered.
The Looks
Apple shortened the body and added a brushed metal face for durability. There was a previous Nano version with a rounded metal face. Then they tried the certain composite plastic face that so easily scratched and smudged. The benefit smooth has the colorful aluminum surface broken-down on most iPods that is known for attracting fingerprints. The brushed metal face holds up better, but you quiet need a screen.
The hide is smallish, though I would argue tranquil adequate. But the thin body alone allows this player to overcome having less features than many competing players. Apple does lose points for the smaller click-wheel being awkward for those with large hands.
Features
The ability to peer videos and play games is enormous. With the 8 GB capacity you can unruffled regain enough on here for a flight. That's the main advantage over the 4GB model. Watching videos will sever battery life to about 5 hours though.
Apple's software gives you minute remark control over your music and few file options. For people like me with multiple players, it's harder to manage your music library with multiple copies. iTunes is friendly enough for most users. You can easily convert and import your files, but it's an annoying extra step.
Cover-flow calm underperforms on the Nano versus the iPod Touch. To me it's not a deal-breaker with the nano's right buttons. You unruffled have the advantages of a flash-based player.
Conclusion
Apple's nice ticket, sleek execute and a wealth of accessories overcome any missing features or annoying software limits. Unless you can afford a 16 or 32 GB iPod Touch or expect some of the missing features offered by the competition, go with this iPod Nano 8 GB and don't behold relieve.
Enjoy!
So last night I picked up my first Ipod, got a Gloomy 8 GB Nano. Blissful I waited for the fresh "beefy" version. A few months help I bought my sister a Nano as a gift so comparing the "slim" Nano to the "elephantine" video Nano I like the one better, the extra width helps me have onto the player better.
My one caution is this: with the unusual coverflow feature you need to be very careful how you organize your music, spent a sparkling amount of time last night getting that sorted out. If any of the sign information on any song(s) is off from the rest of the album it will produce multiple albums in coverflow, also not having any album art for any music becomes annoying in coverflow. So my advice is; obtain positive you're meticulous on how you organize in iTunes. I did leer a few times that the coverflow artwork did acquire a second to load the image as I was scrolling, but this seems to go away after a few times.
The "split" veil from the menu that randomly shows some of your album art is very cold, since the half hide can't exhibit a whole album hide it pans across the album art randomly, the cloak that is explain is random as well.
Very wintry.
Last item, some people will rant about how the 8 GB Nano is on $50 bucks less than the 80 GB Classic. Remember its hard drive vs. flash memory, as I tend to be active and go around a lot and conception to exercise the Nano while at the gym I wanted the stability of flash memory. to me comparing the two is like comparing a dump truck to a sports car, you may want one or the other at a given time so it's really up to settle what is primary, capacity or portability?
